References

Anderson, MJ, 2001. A new method for non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral ecology. 26, 32–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x.
Anderson, MJ, 2004. PERMANOVA 2factor: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance using permutation tests. University of Auckland, Auckland.
Andreani, TL, Bastos, RP, Dias, TM, Prado, CPA, Morais, AR, 2021. Acoustic variability among male gladiator frogs, Boana goiana(Lutz, 1968) (Anura: Hylidae): an 18-year analysis across several reproductive seasons. Amphibia-Reptilia. 42:43-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10029
Barber, JR., Crooks, KR, Fristrup, KM, 2010. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 25, 180–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002.
Bastos, RP., Alcantara, B, Morais, AR, Lingnau, R, Signorelli. L, 2011. Vocal behaviour and conspecific call response in Scinax centralis . Herpetological Journal, 21, 43–50.
Bastos, RP, Haddad CFB, 2002. Acoustic and aggressive interactions inScinax rizibilis (Anura: Hylidae) during the reproductive activity in southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 23, 97–104.
Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E, Ríos-Chélen, A, Gil, D, Garcia, CM, 2009. Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour. 146, 1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X423104.
Bertoluci, J, Brassaloti, RA, Júnior, JWR, Vilela, VMF, Sawakuchi, HO, 2007. Species composition and similarities among anuran assemblages of forest sites in southeastern brazil. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba). 64, 364–374, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000400007.
Bittencourt, L, Barbosa, M, Secchi, E, Lailson-Brito, J, Azevedo, A, 2016. Acoustic habitat of an oceanic archipelago in the Southwestern Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 115, 103–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.06.001.
Bosch, J, De La Riva, I, 2004. Are frog calls modulated by the environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 82, 880–888, https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-060.
Caldart, VM, Iop, S, Lingnau, R, Cechin, SZ, 2016. Communication in a noisy environment: short-term acoustic adjustments and the underlying acoustic niche of a Neotropical stream-breeding frog. Acta Ethologica. 19, 151–162, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-016-0235-2.
Carr, L.W., Fahrig, L., 2001. Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1071–1078, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x.
Caorsi, VZ, Both, C, Cechin, S, Antunes, R, Borges-Martins, M, 2017. Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs. PLoS ONE. 12, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197632.
Cruz, D., Marciano-jr, E, Napoli, MF, 2014. Advertisement and courtship calls of Phyllodytes wuchereri (Peters, 1873) (Anura: Hylidae). Zootaxa. 3774, 97–100, https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3774.1.8.
Cunnington, GM, Fahrig, L, 2010. Plasticity in the vocalizations of anurans in response to traffic noise. Acta Oecologica. 36, 463–470, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.06.002.
Desrochers, L, Proulx, R, 2017. Acoustic masking of soniferous species of the St-Lawrence lowlands. Landscape and Urban Planning. 168, 31–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.015.
Eterovick, PC, 2008. Use and sharing of calling and retreat sites byPhyllodytes luteolus in a modified environment. Journal of Herpetology. 33, 17–22, https://doi.org/10.2307/1565538.
Ey, E, Fischer, J, 2009. The “Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis” - A review of the evidence from Birds, Anurans and Mammals. Journal of Bioacoustics. February 21–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2009.9753613.
Ferreira, RB, Schineider, JAP, Teixeira, RL, 2012. Diet, fecundity, and use of Bromeliads by Phyllodytes luteolus (Anura: Hylidae) in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Herpetology. 46, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1670/09-040.
Forti, LR, Becker, G, Tacioli, L, Pereira, VR, Santos, AC, Oliveira, I, Haddad, CFB, Toledo, LF, 2017. Perspectives on invasive amphibians in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 12, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184703.
Friedl, TWP, 2006. Individual male calling pattern and male mating success in the European Treefrog (Hyla arborea ): Is there evidence for directional or stabilizing selection on male calling behaviour? Ethology, 112, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01132.x
Furtado, R, Santos, S, Dias, TM, Bastos, RP, Nomura, F, 2016. Vocal repertoire during reproductive and aggressive contexts of three Brazilian Tree Frogs: Bokermannohyla sapiranga, Hypsiboas albopunctatus and H. Goianus (Anura: Hylidae). South American Journal of Herpetology. 11, 136–147, https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-16-00002.1.
Gambale, PG, Bastos, RP, 2014. Vocal repertoire and bioacoustic analyses in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from southern Brazil. Herpetological Journal, 24, 31–39.
Gerhardt, HC, Tanner, SD, Corrigan, CM, Walton, H, 2000. Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor ). Behavioral Ecology. 11, 663–669, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.6.663.
Gerhardt, HC, Huber, F, 2002 Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. 1. ed. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Gingras, B, Boeckle, M, Herbst, CT, Fitch WT, 2013. Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans. Journal of Zoology. 289, 143–150, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00973.x.
Gomes, L, Solé, M, Sousa-Lima, RS, Baumgarten, JE, 2022. Influence of anthropogenic sounds on insect , anuran and bird acoustic signals : A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.827440.
Goutte, S, Dubois, A, Howard, SD, Márquez, R, Rowley, JJL, Dehling, J. M., Grandcolas, P., Xiong, R. C., Legendre, F. 2018. How the environment shapes animal signals : a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 31, 148–158,  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13210.
Grenat, PR, Pollo, FE, Ferrero, MA, Martino, AL, 2019. Differential and additive effects of natural biotic and anthropogenic noise on call properties of Odontophrynus americanus (Anura, Odontophryinidae): Implications for the conservation of anurans inhabiting noisy environments. Ecological Indicators. 99, 67–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.014.
Guerra, V, Llusia, D, Gambale, PG, Morais, AR, Márquez, R, Bastos, RP, 2018. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: Historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PLoS ONE. 13, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191691.
Halfwerk, W, Lea, AM, Guerra, MA, Page, RA, Ryan, MJ, 2016. Vocal responses to noise reveal the presence of the Lombard effect in a frog. Behavioral Ecology. 27, 669–676, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv204.
Hanna, DEL, Wilson, DR, Blouin-Demers, G, Mennill, DJ, 2014. Spring peepers Pseudacris crucifer modify their call structure in response to noise. Current Zoology. 60, 438–448, https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/60.4.438.
Herrera-Montes, MI, Aide, TM, 2011. Impacts of traffic noise on anuran and bird communities. Urban Ecosystems. 4, 15–427, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0158-7.
Hoskin, CJ, Goosem, MW, 2016. Road impacts on abundance, call traits, and body size of Rainforest Frogs in Northeast Australia. Ecology and Society. 15, 15, DOI: 10.5751/ES-03272-150315.
Kaiser, K, Hammers, JL, 2009. The effect of anthropogenic noise on male advertisement call rate in the neotropical treefrog, Dendropsophus triangulum . Behaviour. 146, 1053–1069, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X404457.
Kight, CR, Swaddle, JP, 2011. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters. 04, 1052–1061,  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x.
Kime, NM, Turner, WR, Ryan, MJ, 2000. The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behavioral Ecology. 11, 1–83, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.1.71.
Köhler, J, Jansen, M, Rodríguez, A, Kok, PJR, Toledo, LF, Emmerich, M, Glaw, F, Haddad, CFB, Rodel, MO, Vences, M, 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: Theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 4251, 1-124, https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1.
Legett, HD, Madden, RP, Aihara, I, Bernal, XE, 2020. Traffic noise differentially impacts call types in a Japanese treefrog (Buergeria japonica ). Ethology. 126, 76–583, https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13009.
Lengagne, T, 2008. Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea . Biological Conservation. 141, 2023–2031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.017.
Leon, E, Peltzer, PM, Lorenzon, R, Lajmanovich, RC, Beltzer, AH, 2019. Effect of traffic noise on Scinax nasicus advertisement call (Amphibia, Anura). Ilheringia. 109, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019007.
Machado, RA, Bernarde, PS, Morato, SAA, Anjos, L, 1999. Análise comparada da riqueza de anuros entre duas áreas com diferentes estados de conservação no município de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 16, 997–1004, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000400009..
Mageski, MM, Ferreira, RB, Beard, KH, Costa, LC, Jesus, PR, Medeiros, CC, Ferreira, PD, 2016. Bromeliad selection by Phyllodytes luteolus (Anura, Hylidae): the influence of plant structure and water quality factors. Journal of Herpetology. 50, 108–112, https://doi.org/10.1670/14-166.
Melcón, ML, Cummins, AJ, Kerosky, SM, Roche, LK, Wiggins, SM, Hildebrand, JÁ. 2012. Blue whales respond to anthropogenic noise. PLoS ONE. 7, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032681.
Moore, SE, Clarke, JT, 2002. Potential impact of offshore human activities on gray whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 4, 9–25.
Morais, AR, Batista, VG, Gambale, PG, Signorelli, L, Bastos, RP, 2012. Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus ): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination. Herpetological Journal. 22, 249-257.
Morton, E. S. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. 1975. The American Naturalist, 109, 17–34.
Parris, KM, Velik-Lord, M, North, JMA, 2009. Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecology and Society. 14, 15, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art25/.
Penna, M, Solís, R, 1998. Frog call intensities and sound propagation iin the South American temperate forest region. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 42, 371–381, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050452.
Peixoto, O. L., 1995. Associação de anuros a bromeliáceas na Mata Atlântica. Revista Universidade Rural: Série Ciências da Vida. Seropédica 17: 75-83
R Core Team, 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www. R-project.org/.
Sabagh, LT, Ferreira, RB, Rocha, CFD, 2017. Host bromeliads and their associated frog species: further considerations on the importance of species interactions for conservation. Symbiosis. 73, 201–211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-017-0500-9.
Salinas, A. S., Costa, RN, Orrico, VGD, Solé, M, 2018. Tadpoles of the bromeliad-dwelling frog Phyllodytes luteolus are able to prey on mosquito larvae. Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 30, 85–496, https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2018.1438518.
Salles, ROL, Silva-Soares, T, 2010. Phyllodytes luteolus (Anura, Hylidae) as an Alien Species in the Rio de Janeiro municipality, State of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil. Herpetology Notes. 3, 57–258.
Simon, JE, Gasparini, JL, 2003. Descrição da vocalização dePhyllodytes kautskyi Peixoto e Cruz, 1988 (Amphibia,Anura,Hylidae). Biologia, 1988, 7–54.
Slabbekoorn, H, Ripmeester, EAP, 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology. 17, 72–8, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03487.x.
Solé, M., Loebmann, D. 2017. Disgusting or delicious? Predatory behavior of the hylid frog Phyllodytes luteolus on sympatric ants. Ilheringia, Série Zoologia. 107. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4766e2017030.
Stocker, M. 2002. Fish, mollusks and other sea animals’ use of sound, and the impact of anthropogenic noise in the marine acoustic environment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 112, 2431–2431.
Sun, JWC, Narins, PM, 2005. Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation. 121, 419–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017.
Toledo, LF, Martins, IA, Bruschi, DP, Passos, MA, Alexandre, C, Haddad, CFB, 2015. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethologica, 18, 87–99, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4.
Toledo, LF, Carvalho-e-Silva, SP, Sánchez, C, Almeida, MA, Haddad, CFB, 2010. A revisão do Código Florestal Brasileiro: impactos negativos para a conservação dos anfíbios. Biota Neotrop. 10, 35–38, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000400003.
Troïanowski, M, Mondy, N, Dumet, A, Arcanjo, C, Lengnage, T, 2017. Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling. Conservation Biology. 31, 132–1140, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12893.
Warren, P. S., Katti, M, Ermann, M, Brazel, A, 2006. Urban bioacoustics: It’s not just noise. Animal Behaviour. 71, 491–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014.
Wells, K. D. 2007. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians, The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
Wells, KD, Schwartz, JJ, 2006. The behavioral ecology of Anuran communication. In: Narins, PM. et al. (Eds.). Hearing and sound communication in Amphibians. New York: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 44–86.
Wollerman, L, Wiley, RH, 2002. Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour. 63, 15–22, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1885.
Yi, YZ, Sheridan, JA, 2019. Effects of traffic noise on vocalisations of the rhacophorid tree frog Kurixalus chaseni (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Borneo. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 67, 77–8, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0007.
Zhao, L, Sun, X, Chen, Q, Yang, Y, Wang, J, Ran, J, Brauth, SE, Tang, Y, Cui, J, 2018 Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog. Ecology and Evolution. 8, 11733–11741,
Zhao, L, Wang, T, Guo, R, Zhai, X, Zhou, L, Cui, J, Wang, J, 2021. Differential effect of aircraft noise on the spectral-temporal acoustic characteristics of frog species. Animal Behaviour. 182, 9–18, DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.09.014.
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA, Smith, GM, 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Vol. 574). New York: Springer.