References
Andrews, S., Burton, A. M., Schweinberger, S. R., & Wiese, H. (2017). Event-related potentials reveal the development of stable face representations from natural variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70 (8), 1620-1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1195851
Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory & Cognition, 12 , 219-228.
Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (4), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011
Burton, A. M., Kramer, R. S., Ritchie, K. L., & Jenkins, R. (2016). Identity from variation: Representations of faces derived from multiple instances. Cognitive Science, 40 (1), 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12231
Cepulic, D. B., Wilhelm, O., Sommer, W., & Hildebrandt, A. (2018). All categories are equal, but some categories are more equal than others: The psychometric structure of object and face cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 44 (8), 1254-1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000511
Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.Neuropsychologia, 44 (4), 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
Duchaine, B., Germine, L., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24 (4), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264329070138049
Furl, N., Garrido, L., Dolan, R. J., Driver, J., & Duchaine, B. (2011). Fusiform Gyrus face selectivity relates to individual differences in facial recognition ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (7), 1723-1740. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21545
Gao, W., Cao, B., Shan, S., Chen, X., Zhou, D., Zhang, X., & Zhao, D. (2008). The CAS-PEAL large-scale Chinese face database and baseline evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 38 (1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmca.2007.909557
Good P. I. (1994). Permutation tests: A practical guide for testing hypotheses . Springer, New York
Gosling, A., & Eimer, M. (2011). An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49 (9), 2736-2745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.025
Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., Goj, R., Jas, M., Brooks, T., Parkkonen, L., & Hämäläinen, M. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python.Frontiers in Neuroscience 7 , 267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
Gustafsson, F. (1996). Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 44 , 988–992. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.492552
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (6), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
Herzmann, G., Kunina, O., Sommer, W., & Wilhelm, O. (2010). Individual Differences in Face Cognition: Brain-Behavior Relationships.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (3), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21249
Hildebrandt, A., Sommer, W., Herzmann, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2010). Structural invariance and age-related performance differences in face cognition. Psychology and Aging, 25(4) , 794-810. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019774
Huang, L., Song, Y., Li, J., Zhen, Z., Yang, Z., & Liu, J. (2014). Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00483
Kaltwasser, L., Hildebrandt, A., Recio, G., Wilhelm, O., & Sommer, W. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14 , 861-878. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0234-y
Kaufmann, J. M., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2009). N250 ERP Correlates of the Acquisition of Face Representations across Different Images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4) , 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21080s
Kotowski, K., Ochab, J., Stapor, K., & Sommer, W. (2023). The importance of ocular artifact removal in single-trial ERP analysis: The case of the N250 in face learning. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 79 , 104115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104115
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1) , 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/82947
Li, J., Huang, L., Song, Y., & Liu, J. (2017). Dissociated neural basis of two behavioral hallmarks of holistic face processing: The whole-part effect and composite-face effect. Neuropsychologia, 102 , 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.026
Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5 , 212-228.
Nowparast Rostami, H., Sommer, W., Zhou, C., Wilhelm, O., & Hildebrandt, A. (2017). Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials.Cortex, 95, 192-210. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.017
Olderbak, S., Pollak, K., Sanchez, J. F., & Hildebrandt, A. (2022). Assessing individual differences in face recognition: No impact of task design features on the structure of this ability. Psychological Assessment, 34 , 1172-1179. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001173
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Echallier, J.F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 72 , 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6
Ramot, M., Walsh, C., & Martin, A. (2019). Multifaceted integration: Memory for faces is subserved by widespread connections between visual, memory, auditory, and social networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(25) , 4976-4985. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-19.2019
Russell, R., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16 (2), 252-257. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.252
Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex, 39 , 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70071-6
Schweinberger, S. R., Pfütze, E. M., & Sommer, W. (1995). Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 722-736. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.3.722
Schweinberger, S. R., Kaufmann, J. M., Moratti, S., Keil, A., & Burton, A. M. (2007). Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects – An MEG study. Brain Research, 1184 , 226-233.
Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions.Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3) , 398-409.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00142-8
Sommer, W., Heinz, A., Leuthold, H., & Matt, J. (1995). Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 23, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210552
Sommer, W., Stapor, K., Kończak, G., Kotowski, K., Fabian, P., Ochab, J., Bereś, A., Ślusarczyk, G. (2021). The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity: a replication study. Royal Society Open Science, 8 , 202356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202356
Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A.L., Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 , 1488–1497. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A , 161-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966
Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A , 671-703.
Valentine, T., Lewis, M. B., & Hills, P. J. (2016). Face-space: A unifying concept in face recognition research. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10 ), 1996-2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.990392
Wiese, H., Anderson, D., Beierholm, U., Tüttenberg, S.C., Young, A.W., Burton, A.M. (2021). Detecting a viewer’s familiarity with a face: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and classifier analyses.Psychophysiology, 59 , e13950. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13950
Wilhelm, O., Herzmann, G., Kunina, O., Danthiir, V., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2010). Individual differences in perceiving and recognizing faces: One element of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3) , 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019972