References
Amézquita, A., Castro, L., Arias, M., González, M., & Esquivel, C. (2013). Field but not lab paradigms support generalisation by predators of aposematic polymorphic prey: the Oophaga histrionica complex.Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9635-1
Amézquita, A., Ramos, O., González, M. C., Rodríguez, C., Medina, I., Simões, P. I., & Lima, A. P. (2017). Conspicuousness, color resemblance, and toxicity in geographically diverging mimicry: The pan‐Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis . Evolution, 71 , 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13170
Angelo, C. (2019). Brazil freezes science spending. Nature, 568(7751), 155-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01079-9
Ávila-Pires, T. C. S. D., Hoogmoed, M. S., & Rocha, W. A. D. (2010). Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan Region, I. Herpetofauna, Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Naturais, 5 , 13–112
Baldo, D., Borteiro, C., Kolenc, F., & Rosset, S. (2012). The taxonomic status of Melanophryniscus orejasmirandai Prigioni & Langone, 1987 “1986” (Anura: Bufonidae). Zootaxa, 3235 , 45–61. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3235.1.4
Chatelain, P., Elias, M., Fontaine, C., Villemant, C., Dajoz, I., & Perrard, A. (2023). Müllerian mimicry among bees and wasps: a review of current knowledge and future avenues of research. Biological Reviews, 2023, 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12955
Chouteau, M., & Angers, B. (2011). The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals. The American Naturalist, 178 , 810-817. https://doi.org/10.1086/662667
Crump, M. L. (1988). Aggression in harlequin frogs: male-male competition and a possible conflict of interest between the sexes.Animal Behaviour, 36 , 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80066-6
Daly, J. W., Garraffo, H. M., Spande, T. F., Yeh, H. J. C., Peltzer, P. M., Cacivio, P. M., Baldo, J. D. & Faivovich, J. (2008). Indolizidine 239Q and quinolizidine 275I. Major alkaloids in two Argentinian bufonid toads (Melanophryniscus ). Toxicon, 52 , 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.016
Duellman, W. E., & Trueb, L. (1986). Biology of Amphibians . New York McGraw-Hill.
Escobar, H. (2019). Brazilian president attacks deforestation data.Science, 365 , 419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.365.6452.419
Fernandes, G. W., Vale, M. M., Overbeck, G. E., Bustamante, M. M. C., Grelle, C. E. V., Pillar, V. D. (2017). Dismantling Brazil’s science threatens global biodiversity heritage. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15 , 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Frost, D. R. (2022). Amphibian species of the world: An online reference . American Museum of Natural History.
Gehara, M., Summers, K., & Brown, J. L. (2013). Population expansion, isolation and selection: novel insights on the evolution of color diversity in the strawberry poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9652-0
Hegna, R. H., Saporito, R. A. & Donnelly, M. A. (2013). Not all colors are equal: predation and color polytypism in the aposematic poison frogOophaga pumilio . Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9605-z
Heyer, W. R., Rand, A. S., da Cruz, C. A. G., Peixoto, O. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1990). frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de zoologia, 31 , 231–410.
Hödl, W., & Amézquita, A. (2001). Visual signaling in anuran amphibians. In: Ryan, M. J., editor. Anuran communication . Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. p. 121–141.
Hoffman, E. A., & Blouin, M. S. (2000). A review of colour and pattern polymorphisms in anurans. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 70 , 633–665.
Jeckel, A. M., Kocheff, S., Saporito, R. A. & Grant, T. (2019). Geographically separated orange and blue populations of the Amazonian poison frog Adelphobates galactonotus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) do not differ in alkaloid composition or palatability. Chemoecology, 29 , 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-019-00291-3
Jorge, R. F., Ferrão, M., & Lima, A. P. (2020a). Out of bound: a new threatened harlequin toad (bufonidae, Atelopus ) from the outer borders of the Guiana shield in central Amazonia described through integrative taxonomy. Diversity , 12 , 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12080310
Jorge, R. F., Magnusson, W. E., Silva, D. A. D., Polo, E. M., & Lima, A. P. (2020). Urban growth threatens the lowland Amazonian Manaus harlequin frog which represents an evolutionarily significant unit within the genus Atelopus (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae).Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research ,58 , 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12390
La Marca, E., Lips, K. L., Lötters, S., Puschendorf, R., Ibáñez, R., Rueda-Almonacid, J. V., Schulte, R., Marty, C., Castro, F., Manzanilla-Puppo, J., García-Pérez, J. E., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G., Pounds, J. A., Toral, E., & Young, B. E. (2005). Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus ). Biotropica, 37 , 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00026.x
Lescure, J. (1981). Contribution al’étude des Amphibiens de Guyane française. VIII. Validation d’Atelopus spumarius Cope, 1871, et désignation d’un néotype. Description d’Atelopus spumariusbarbotini nov. ssp. Données étho-écologiques et biogéographiques sur les Atelopus du groupe flavescens (Anoures, Bufonidées). Bulletin du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris, 3 , 893–910.
Lima, J. D. (2008). A herpetofauna do Parque Nacional do Montanhas do Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil, Expedições I a V. In: Bernard, E., editor.Inventários Biológicos Rápidos no Parque Nacional Montanhas do Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil . Arlington (VA): Conservation International. p. 38–50.
Lindquist, E. D., & Hetherington, T. E. (1996). Field studies on visual and acoustic signaling in the “earless” Panamanian golden frog,Atelopus zeteki . Journal of Herpetology, 30 , 347–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1565171
Lindquist, E. D., & Hetherington, T. E. (1998). Semaphoring in an earless frog: the origin of a novel visual signal. Animal Cognition, 1 , 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050012
Loeffler-Henry, K., Kang, C., & Sherratt, T. N. (2023). Evolutionary transitions from camouflage to aposematism: Hidden signals play a pivotal role. Science, 379 , 1136–1140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade5156
Loetters, S., Van der Meijden, A., Coloma, L. A., Boistel, R., Cloetens, P., Ernst, R., Lehr, E., & Veith, M. (2011). Assessing the molecular phylogeny of a near extinct group of vertebrates: the Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae; Atelopus). Systematics and Biodiversity, 9 , 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2011.557403
Lötters, S., Plewnia, A., Hoenig, A., Jung, A., Laudor, J., & Ziegler, T. (2022). The gastromyzophorous tadpole of the pink harlequin frog from Suriname with comments on the taxonomy of Guianan Clade Atelopus (Amphibia, Bufonidae). Zootaxa, 5087 , 591–598. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5087.4.7
Lötters, S., Schulte, R., Córdova, J. H., & Veith, M. (2005). Conservation priorities for harlequin frogs (Atelopus spp.) of Peru. Oryx, 39 , 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000852
Lötters, S., Haas, W., Schick, S., & Böhme, W. (2002). On the systematics of the harlequin frogs (Amphibia: Bufonidae:Atelopus ) from Amazonia. II: redescription of Atelopus pulcher (Boulenger, 1882) from the eastern Andean versant in Peru.Salamandra, 38 , 165–184.
Maan, M. E., & Cummings, M. E. (2008). Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog.Evolution, 62 , 2334–2345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x
Mebs, D., Lorentz, M., Yotsu-Yamashita, M., Rößler, D. C., Ernst, R., & Lötters, S. (2018). Geographic range expansion of tetrodotoxin in amphibians – first record in Atelopus hoogmoedi from the Guiana Shield. Toxicon, 150 , 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.05.011
Noonan, B. P., & Gaucher, P. (2005). Phylogeography and demography of Guianan harlequin toads (Atelopus ): diversification within a refuge. Molecular Ecology, 14 , 3017–3031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02624.x
Noonan, B. P. & Comeault, A. A. (2009). The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biology letters, 5 , 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0586
Peres, C. A., Ritter, C. D., & Campos-Silva, J. (2023). Renewed environmental governance scenarios in the Brazilian Amazon. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38 , 389–390. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.009
Pyron, R. A., & Wiens, J. J. (2013). Large-scale phylogenetic analyses reveal the causes of high tropical amphibian diversity.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280 , 20131622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1622
Richards-Zawacki, C. L., Yeager, J., Bart, H. P. S. (2013). No evidence for differential survival or predation between sympatric color morphs of an aposematic poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9636-0
Rößler, D. C., Lötters, S., Mappes, J., Valkonen, J. K., Menin, M., Lima, A. P., & Pröhl, H. (2019). Sole coloration as an unusual aposematic signal in a Neotropical toad. Scientific Reports, 9 , 1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37705-1
Rojas, D. P., Stow, A., Amézquita, A., Simões, P. I., & Lima, A. P. (2015). No predatory bias with respect to colour familiarity for the aposematic Adelphobates galactonotus (Anura: Dendrobatidae).Behaviour, 152 , 1637–1657. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003297
Rojas, D., Lima, A. P., Momigliano, P., Simões, P. I., Dudaniec, R. Y., Avila-Pires, T. C. S., Hoogmoed, M. S., Bitar, Y O. C., Kaefer, I. L., Amézquita, A., & Stow, A. (2020). The evolution of polymorphism in the warning coloration of the Amazonian poison frog Adelphobates galactonotus . Heredity, 124 , 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0281-4
Rudh, A., Rogell, B., & Hȍglund, J. (2007). Non-gradual variation in color morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio : genetic and geographical isolation suggests a role for selection in maintaining polymorphism. Molecular Ecology, 16 , 4284–4294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03479.x
Rueda Almonacid J. V., Rodríguez Mahecha, J. V., La Marca, E., Lötters, S., Kahn, T., & Ângulo, A. (2005). Ranas Arlequines. Conservación Internacional Series libretas de Campo . Bogotá Colombia: Conservación internacional Colombia.
Silva, G. W. B., Cornélio, G. S., Oliveira, E. A., Trindade, N. G. P., França, I., & Hernández Ruz, E. J. (2020). A candidate species currently classified as Atelopus hoogmoedi (Anura: Bufonidae) in the eastern Amazon, Pará, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research 19 , gmr18392.
Silva-e-Silva, Y. B., & Costa-Campos, C. E. (2018). Anuran species composition of Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Municipality of Serra do Navio, Amapá state, Brazil. ZooKeys , 762 , 131–148. https://doi.org/10.3897%2Fzookeys.762.22634
Tazzyman, S. J., & Iwasa, Y. (2010). Sexual selection can increase the effect of random genetic drift—a quantitative genetic model of polymorphism in Oophaga pumilio , the strawberry poison-dart frog.Evolution, 64 , 1719–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00923.x
Toledo, L.F. and Haddad, C.F.B. (2009). Colors and some morphological traits as defensive mechanisms in anurans. International Journal of Zoology, 910892 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/910892
Valencia, L. M., & Fonte, L. F. M. (2022). Collaborative work brings hope for threatened harlequin toads. Oryx, 56 , 12–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001319
Wells, K. (2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
Willink, B., García-Rodríguez, A., Bolaños, F., & Pröhl, H. (2014). The interplay between multiple predators and prey colour divergence.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113 , 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12355
Yotsu-Yamashita, M., & Tateki, E. (2010). First report on toxins in the Panamanian toads Atelopus limosus , A. glyphus and A. certus . Toxicon, 55 , 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.07.003
Zamora-Camacho, F. J., & Comas, M. (2019). Beyond sexual dimorphism and habitat boundaries: coloration correlates with morphology, age, and locomotor performance in a toad. Evolutionary Biology, 46 , 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9466-7