References
1. Grant J. The Best Start: A Five-year Forward Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2017.
2. NHS England. Better Births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England: A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. London: NHS England; 2016.
3. Welsh Government. Maternity Care in Wales. A five year vision for the future (2019-2024. Cardiff: Welsh Government; 2019.
4. Scottish Executive. Report of the Expert Group on Acute Maternity Services. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. 2002.
5. Homer CS, Leap N, Edwards N, Sandall J. Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: a retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997–2009). Midwifery. 2017;48:1-10.
6. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016( Issue 4).
7. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129-45.
8. Department of Health. Safer Maternity Care: The National Maternity Safety Strategy—Progress and Next Steps. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2017.
9. Crowe C, Manley K. Person-centred, safe and effective care in maternity services: the need for greater change towards best practice. International Practice Development Journal. 2019;9(1):1-20.
10. Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation: An independent investigation into the management, delivery and outcomes of care provided by the maternity and neonatal services at the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust from January 2004 to June 2013. London: HMSO; 2015. Report No.: 0108561305.
11. Heath G, Cameron E, Cummins C, Greenfield S, Pattison H, Kelly D, et al. Paediatric ‘care closer to home’: stake-holder views and barriers to implementation. Health & Place. 2012;18(5):1068-73.
12. Helps A, Leitao S, Greene R, O’Donoghue K. Perinatal mortality audits and reviews: Past, present and the way forward. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020;250:24-30.
13. Hoang H, Le Q, Ogden K. Women’s maternity care needs and related service models in rural areas: a comprehensive systematic review of qualitative evidence. Women and Birth. 2014;27(4):233-41.
14. Pitchforth E, Watson V, Tucker J, Ryan M, Van Teijlingen E, Farmer J, et al. Models of intrapartum care and women’s trade‐offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed‐methods study. British Jountal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;115(5):560-9.
15. Pitchforth E, Van Teijlingen E, Watson V, Tucker J, Kiger A, Ireland J, et al. “Choice” and place of delivery: a qualitative study of women in remote and rural Scotland. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2009;18(1):42-8.
16. Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S. The reality of resistance: the experiences of rural parturient women. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2006;51(4):260-5.
17. Kornelsen JA, Grzybowski SW. Obstetric services in small rural communities: what are the risks to care providers? Rural and Remote Health. 2008;8(2):1.
18. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London: Sage Publications; 1996.
19. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
20. Offerhaus PM, Otten W, Boxem-Tiemessen JC, de Jonge A, van der Pal-de KM, Scheepers PL, et al. Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment. Midwifery. 2015;31(4):e69-e78.
21. Fletcher BR, Rowe R, Hollowell J, Scanlon M, Hinton L, Rivero-Arias O. Exploring women’s preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2019;14(4):e0215098.