My notes for the panel today at
Health
Datapalooza. I’ll come back later and add links, fix typos, and so
forth…
Why consumer access to data is important
- because data
is a digital representation of us. and it’s increasingly being used to
affect our real-world services, their costs, their benefits.
- we’re increasingly able to generate data that used to be the exclusive
space of the clinical system. genomes are just part of it. health data
is in everything. Facebook cups, keyboards, iPhones, google’s next
phone.
- but it’s faulty at worst, and incomplete at best. if we can’t access
it, we can’t tell how and where it’s incomplete or
wrong.
Use cases and potential applications for
consumer access to data
- send to app provider to
interpret data and help me make better choices about my care.
- send to app provider to interpret data and help me make better
lifestyle choices (ideally not a panopticon of health provider, ATT, and
government - but a decentralized, competitive
market)
that’s what this event is mainly concerned
with. but there’s more.
- extract the “real” clinical
data (compared to the “dry” data from phones etc) from the record.
needs a lot of normalization etc but it starts to paint a longitudinal
phenotype of me and my life. mapped to my genome, in large in sample
sizes, we can start to correlate lifestyle and medical treatment
outcomes to individual genomic variation.
Current state
of consumer access to data
- raw in every sense of the
word. most folks aren’t exactly aware of the things we here are aware
of.
- most of the data collection is happening in zones like mobile and
social where we have no positive rights to privacy, like health, and
where the entire system depends on designing awareness of the data (and
its ownership) out of the hands of us as citizens.
- in health, access to data is hamstrung by a combination of rapidly
advancing technology and slowly (that’s a nice way of putting it)
adapting law.
- we just moved here from Oakland. when i wanted my son’s immunization
records to get him into his new child care center here in DC, the
provider couldn’t fax them to me because they were afraid it violated
hipaa. but it would have been legal to hire a TaskRabbit - total
stranger - to go pick them up, take them to Kinkos, and fax them to
me.
- that’s insane. we’re not being protected. we’re not getting access at
the rate or in the form that we need yet. it’s getting better, but it’s
still slow. and we’re less willing to tolerate it, because we’ve been
trained to expect more from our institutions by good
technology.
Where we have to go next / role of Blue
Button+
- the hard part is that most of us, when handed
a file of data, don’t know what to do with it. i downloaded my genotype,
my fitbit data. No idea what to do with it. compared to my “medical
record” in PDF, which is computationally useless but human readable.
- the investment in BB will pay off best when I have the right to direct
my file to someone who can do something with it, for whatever reasons i
choose. whether to run an app that makes sense of the data or to donate
the data to research.
- BB+ is a great example of this. It allows for both market solutions
(banks!) to emerge and for pre-competitive or public private solutions
to emerge where we can donate data, or share it conditionally.
- i’m looking forward to pushing Sage Bionetworks, the non profit where
I work, to be one of the first certified recipients of BB+ precisely to
enable the non-market reuse of health records data.