loading page

Response to Technical Comment ‘A cautionary note for users of linear diversification dependencies’
  • Helene Morlon,
  • Jonathan Rolland,
  • Fabien Condamine
Helene Morlon
CNRS
Author Profile
Jonathan Rolland
CNRS
Author Profile
Fabien Condamine
CNRS, CNRS
Author Profile

Peer review status:ACCEPTED

05 Mar 2020Submitted to Ecology Letters
05 Mar 2020Submission Checks Completed
05 Mar 2020Assigned to Editor
05 Mar 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
06 Mar 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
09 Mar 20201st Revision Received
10 Mar 2020Assigned to Editor
10 Mar 2020Submission Checks Completed
14 Mar 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
17 Mar 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
17 Mar 20202nd Revision Received
17 Mar 2020Submission Checks Completed
17 Mar 2020Assigned to Editor
18 Mar 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 Mar 2020Editorial Decision: Accept

Abstract

The comment by Gamisch (2020) draws the attention of users of the R-package RPANDA (Morlon et al. 2016) on situations when properly interpreting the results of linear diversification dependencies requires caution. Here we provide clarifications to help users interpreting their results when using any type of functional diversification dependencies with time or the environment.