loading page

Effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm birth: a retrospective study
  • +2
  • Rie SeyamaOrcid,
  • Shintaro Makino,
  • Jun Takeda,
  • Satoru Takeda,
  • Atsuo Itakura
Rie Seyama
Juntendo University
Author Profile
Shintaro Makino
Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital
Author Profile
Jun Takeda
Juntendo University
Author Profile
Satoru Takeda
Juntendo University
Author Profile
Atsuo Itakura
Juntendo University
Author Profile

Peer review status:UNDER REVIEW

13 Jun 2020Submitted to BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
17 Jun 2020Assigned to Editor
17 Jun 2020Submission Checks Completed
20 Jun 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned


Objective: This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm births. Design: A retrospective study. Setting: The perinatal registration database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Perinatal Center from 2014 to 2016. Population or Sample: For this study, 6,060 multiparous women with a history of preterm birth were reviewed. After excluding 17 subjects who had unknown indications for cervical cerclage, 6,043 subjects were included in this study. Methods and main outcome measures: The efficacies of elective, ultrasound-indicated, and emergency cerclage as preventive treatments for women with a history of preterm birth were evaluated by comparing the cerclage and non-cerclage cases. Prior to evaluation, a propensity score matching was performed for elective and ultrasound-indicated cerclage patients. Results: Elective cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies for any of the pregnancy periods (p = 0.413). Similarly, ultrasound-indicated cerclage was ineffective (p = 1.000). In addition, for ultrasound-indicated cerclage, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the risk of a subsequent preterm birth might increase at < 33 weeks of gestation. However, the hazard ratio could not be determined to be statistically significant using the log-rank test at < 28 weeks of gestation. In contrast, emergency cerclage significantly reduced the risk of subsequent preterm birth for all pregnancy periods (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Subsequent preterm births were effectively prevented only in emergency cerclage cases. For elective and ultrasound-indicated cerclage, statistically significant differences in subsequent preterm births were not evident.