Objective: The implantation depth and membranous septum (MS) length are established as the predictors of new-onset conduction disturbance (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis. However, little is known about the predictors with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study investigated the role of MS length and implantation depth in predicting CD following TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve in patients with BAV. Methods and results: This retrospective study analyzed 169 patients who underwent TAVR for BAV with balloon-expandable valve, and TAV cohort was established as a control group using propensity score (PS) matching. The primary endpoint was in-hospital new-onset CD (new-onset left bundle branch block or new permanent pacemaker implantation). New-onset CD developed in 37 patients (21.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed severe LVOT calcification (Odds ratio [OR]: 5.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08 – 31.5, p = 0.0407) and implantation depth – MS length (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12 – 1.51, p = 0.0005) as the predictors of new-onset CD within BAV cohort. The matched comparison between BAV and TAV groups showed similar MS length (3.0 vs 3.2mm, p = 0.5307), but valves were implanted deeper in BAV than TAV group (3.9 vs 3.0mm, p < .0001). New-onset CD was more frequent in patients having BAV (22.3% vs 13.9%, p = 0.0458). Conclusion: The implantation depth - MS length, and severe LVOT calcification predicted new-onset CD following TAVR in BAV with balloon-expandable valve. High implantation technique could be considered to avoid new-onset CD in BAV anatomy.

Aims: Difficulties are often encountered while controlling atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous data revealed that cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was not inferior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA); however, HD patients were excluded in this prior trial. Thus, the efficacy of CBA for HD patients is still unknown. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed HD patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for AF from August 2011 to June 2019. Patients who received CBA (CBA group) and those who received RFA (RFA group) were compared. The primary endpoint was defined as freedom from a composite outcome (a documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia or a prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs) at one year after CA. The secondary endpoint was freedom from a documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia at one year after CA. Results: The RFA and CBA groups were composed of 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Freedom from a composite outcome was 58.4% in the RFA group and 68.2 % in the CBA group (Log-rank: p=0.571). Freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 63.5% in the RFA group and 90.9% in the CBA group (Log-rank: p=0.042). Conclusion: Our results suggest that patients on HD with AF who were treated with CBA tended to have better outcomes than patients treated with RFA. Therefore, CBA could be a suitable ablation method for HD patients.