loading page

CO2 fertilization of Sphagnum peat mosses is modulated by water table level and other environmental factors
  • +2
  • Henrik Serk,
  • Mats Nilsson,
  • João Figueira,
  • Thomas Wieloch,
  • Juergen Schleucher
Henrik Serk
Umeå Universitet Medicinska fakulteten
Author Profile
Mats Nilsson
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet Fakulteten for Skogsvetenskap
Author Profile
João Figueira
Umeå Universitet Teknisk-Naturvetenskaplig Fakultet
Author Profile
Thomas Wieloch
Umeå Universitet Medicinska fakulteten
Author Profile
Juergen Schleucher
Umeå Universitet Medicinska fakulteten
Author Profile

Abstract

Sphagnum mosses account for most accumulated dead organic matter in peatlands. Therefore, understanding their responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 is needed for estimating peatland C balances under climate change. A key process is photorespiration: a major determinant of net photosynthetic C assimilation that depends on the CO2 to O2 ratio. We used climate chambers to investigate photorespiratory responses of Sphagnum fuscum hummocks to recent increases in atmospheric CO2 (from 280 to 400 ppm) under different water table, temperature, and light intensity levels. We tested the photorespiratory variability using a novel method based on deuterium isotopomers (D6S/D6R ratio) of photosynthetic glucose. The effect of elevated CO2 on photorespiration was highly dependent on water table. At low water table (-20 cm), elevated CO2 suppressed photorespiration relative to C assimilation, thus substantially increasing the net primary production potential. In contrast, a high water table (~0 cm) favored photorespiration and abolished this CO2 effect. The response was further tested for Sphagnum majus lawns at typical water table levels (~0 and -7 cm), revealing no effect of CO2 under those conditions. Our results indicate that only hummocks, which typically experience low water table levels, benefit from the 20th century’s increase in atmospheric CO2.

Peer review status:UNDER REVIEW

05 Aug 2020Submitted to Plant, Cell & Environment
06 Aug 2020Assigned to Editor
06 Aug 2020Submission Checks Completed
10 Aug 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
21 Sep 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending