loading page

A comparative study of left atrial appendage wall velocity (LAAWV) in correlation to LV ejection fraction, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), E/e’, and NT pro-BNP in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure.
  • +5
  • Abhijit Bharali,
  • Satyendra Tewari,
  • Harshit khare,
  • ANKIT SAHU,
  • Roopali Khanna,
  • Sudeep Kumar,
  • Naveen Garg,
  • Aditya Kapoor
Abhijit Bharali
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Satyendra Tewari
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
Harshit khare
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
ANKIT SAHU
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
Roopali Khanna
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
Sudeep Kumar
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
Naveen Garg
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile
Aditya Kapoor
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Cardiology
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) function assessment is often overlooked in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), regardless of its etiology (ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy). With trans-thoracic tissue doppler echocardiographic (TDE), we compared LAA wall velocity with the conventional echocardiographic and biochemical parameters of heart failure by evaluating LVEF, LV GLS, E/e’ and serum NT pro-BNP level. Methods and Results: We evaluated 154 stable HFrEF patients with LVEF ≤ 40%. The mean age was 55.71 ± 12.48 years, with 59.09% being male and 40.91% female. Among them, 77.27% had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP), and 22.72% had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP). The mean LVEF was 29.87 ± 5.8, LV GLS was -8.46 ± 2.74, mitral E/e’ was 13.33 ± 2.74, and LAA wall velocity was 14.26 ± 5.56. The mean NT pro-BNP level was 980.51 ± 611.77. Correlation analysis showed that LAA wall velocity significantly correlated with LVEF (r = 0.634, p < 0.001), had an inverse correlation with LV GLS (r = -0.671, p < 0.001), mitral E/e’ (r = -0.756, p < 0.001), and NT pro-BNP (r = -0.659, p = 0.007). Conclusion: TDE LAA wall velocity is a valuable and feasible method for evaluating HFrEF patients. Lower LAA wall velocity is associated with reduced LVEF, impaired LV GLS, elevated left ventricular filling pressure (E/e’), and higher NT pro-BNP levels.