loading page

The use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) as a novel nonsurgical treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective pilot study.
  • +3
  • Stavros Athanasiou,
  • CHRISTOS KALANTZIS,
  • Dimitris Zacharakis,
  • Nikolaos Kathopoulis,
  • Artemis Pontikaki,
  • Themistoklis Grigoriadis
Stavros Athanasiou
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
CHRISTOS KALANTZIS
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences
Author Profile
Dimitris Zacharakis
Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens Greece
Author Profile
Nikolaos Kathopoulis
Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens
Author Profile
Artemis Pontikaki
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences
Author Profile
Themistoklis Grigoriadis
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma (PRP) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment. Design: Prospective observational pilot study. Setting: Tertiary referral urogynecology unit in Greece. Sample: Adult women with urodynamically confirmed SUI. Methods: Twenty women met the inclusion criteria and attended follow-ups. All participants underwent 2 PRP injections into the lower one-third of the anterior vaginal wall at 4-6 week intervals. At baseline they underwent urodynamic studies, a 1-hr pad test and completed the ICIQ-FLUTS and KHQ questionnaires. At follow up visits (1,3 and 6 months) patients underwent the 1hr-pad test and completed the KHQ, ICIQ-FLUTS and PGI-I. Primary outcome was to evaluate post-treatment SUI. Secondary outcomes included assessment of patient reported questionnaires, assessment of urine loss (1hr-pad test) and the level of discomfort during injections (VAS score). Statistical analysis was performed before PRP and 1,3 and 6 months after the last treatment. Results: A significant improvement of SUI symptoms was observed 3 months after treatment with a further improvement at 6 months. A mean reduction of 50.2% of urine loss was observed in the 1hr-pad test. At 6-month follow-up 80.0% of women reported to be at least improved. No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: PRP injections were both effective and safe in the short term and could be offered as an alternative outpatient procedure for the treatment of SUI. However, these encouraging findings warrant further investigation with randomized controlled trials. Funding: No funding to declare. Keywords: PRP; Stress urinary incontinence; Minimally invasive treatment, Female Incontinec