loading page

Seismic Response to Injection Well Stimulation in a High-Temperature, High-Permeability Reservoir
  • +2
  • Chet Hopp,
  • Steven Sewell,
  • Stefan Mroczek,
  • Martha Savage,
  • John Townend
Chet Hopp
Victoria University of Wellington
Author Profile
Steven Sewell
Victoria University of Wellington
Stefan Mroczek
Victoria University of Wellington
Martha Savage
Victoria University of Wellington
John Townend
Victoria University of Wellington


Fluid injection into the earth's crust can induce seismic events that cause damage to local infrastructure but also offer valuable insight into seismogenesis. The factors that influence the magnitude, location and number of induced events remain poorly understood but include injection flow rate and pressure as well as reservoir temperature and permeability. The relationship between injection parameters and injection-induced seismicity in high-temperature, high-permeability reservoirs has not been extensively studied. Here we focus on the Ngatamariki geothermal field in the central Taupō Volcanic Zone, New Zealand where three stimulation/injection tests have occurred since 2012. We present a catalog of seismicity from 2012-2015 created using a matched-filter detection technique. We analyze the stress state in the reservoir during the injection phases from first-motion-derived focal mechanisms, yielding an average direction of maximum horizontal compressive stress (SHMAX) consistent with the regional NE-SW trend. However, there is significant variation in the direction of maximum compressive stress (\(\sigma_{1}\)), which may reflect geological differences between wells. We use the ratio of injection flow rate to overpressure, referred to as injectivity index, as a proxy for near-well permeability, and compare changes in injectivity index to spatiotemporal characteristics of seismicity accompanying each test. Observed increases in injectivity index are generally poorly correlated with seismicity, suggesting that the locations of microearthquakes are not coincident with the zone of stimulation (i.e. increased permeability). Our findings augment a growing body of work suggesting that aseismic opening or slip, rather than seismic shear, is the active process driving well stimulation in many environments.