Alexander Todd

and 11 more

There is large uncertainty in the future sea level change at regional scales under anthropogenic global warming. This study uses a novel design of ocean-only general circulation model (OGCM) experiments to investigate the ocean’s response to surface buoyancy and momentum flux perturbations, as part of the Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP), and compares with results from coupled, atmosphere-ocean GCM (AOGCM) experiments. Much of the inter-model spread is driven by the response to surface heat flux perturbations. In a multi-model ensemble of OGCMs forced with identical surface heat flux perturbations, regional sea level and ocean heat content changes demonstrate considerable disagreement, especially in the North Atlantic. Spread in both residual mean advection and diapycnal diffusion changes contribute to much of the multi-model disagreement over regional heat content change. Residual mean advection changes are related to the large spread in simulated Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) weakening (20-50%). We find approximately 10% more AMOC weakening in response to surface heat flux perturbations in AOGCMs relative to OGCMs with consistent ocean models. This enhanced AMOC weakening is driven by an atmosphere-ocean feedback which amplifies the surface heat flux perturbation. In the North Pacific, there is little agreement amongst the ensemble over which processes lead to ocean warming, with varying contributions from residual mean advection and diapycnal diffusion. For the Pacific basin, the atmosphere-ocean feedback reduces sea surface temperature (SST) warming by 0.5°C. In the Southern Ocean, the atmosphere-ocean feedback is not generally important for buoyancy and momentum flux perturbations.
Sea-level rise (SLR) is a long-lasting consequence of climate change because global anthropogenic warming takes centuries to millennia to equilibrate. SLR projections based on climate models support policy analysis, risk assessment and adaptation planning today, despite their large uncertainties. The central range of the SLR distribution is estimated by process-based models. However, risk-averse practitioners often require information about plausible future conditions that lie in the tails of the SLR distribution, which are poorly defined by existing models. Here, a community effort combining scientist and practitioners, builds on a framework of discussing physical evidence to quantify high-end global SLR for practice. The approach is complementary to the IPCC AR6 report and provides further physically plausible high-end scenarios. High-end estimates for the different SLR components are developed for two climate scenarios at two timescales. For global warming of +2 ˚C in 2100 (SSP1-2.6) relative to pre-industrial values our high-end global SLR estimates are up to 0.9 m in 2100 and 2.5 m in 2300. Similarly, for +5 ˚C (SSP5-8.5) we estimate up to 1.6 m in 2100 and up to 10.4 m in 2300. The large and growing differences between the scenarios beyond 2100 emphasize the long-term benefits of mitigation. However, even a modest 2 ˚C warming may cause multi-meter SLR on centennial time scales with profound consequences for coastal areas. Earlier high-end assessments focused on instability mechanisms in Antarctica, while we emphasize the timing of ice-shelf collapse around Antarctica, which is highly uncertain due to low understanding of the driving processes.