Simon Lacombe

and 5 more

In the Arctic tundra, recurrent periods of food scarcity force predators to rely on a wide variety of resources. In particular most predators use ungulate carcasses as an alternative food supply, especially in winters when live preys are scarce. As important and localized resource patches, carrion promotes co-occurrence of different individuals, and its use by predators is likely to be affected by interspecific competition. Here, we studied how interspecific competition and resource availability impact winter use of carrion by Arctic and red foxes in low Arctic Fennoscandia. We predicted that presence of red foxes limits Arctic foxes' use of carrion, and that the outcome of competition for carrion depends on the availability of alternative food resources, such as rodents. We monitored Arctic and red fox presence at experimentally supplied carrion using camera traps, between 2006 and 2021 in late winter. Using a multi-species dynamic occupancy model at a week-to-week scale, we evaluated use of carrion by foxes, while accounting for the presence of competitors, rodent availability and supplemental feeding provided to Arctic foxes. Competition primarily affected carrion use by increasing both species' probability to leave occupied carcasses to a similar extent, suggesting a symmetrical avoidance. Rodent abundance was associated with an increase in the probability of colonizing carrion for both species. For Arctic foxes, however, this increase was only observed in carcasses unoccupied by red foxes, showing greater avoidance when alternative preys are available. Contrary to expectations, we did not find strong signs of asymmetric competition for carrion in winter. Our results suggest that interactions for resources at a short time scale are not necessarily aligned with interactions at the scale of the population. In addition, we found that competition for carcasses depends on the availability of other resources, suggesting that interactions between predators depend on the ecological context.

Dominique Fauteux

and 4 more

Ecologists are still puzzled by the diverse population dynamics of herbivorous small mammals that range from high-amplitude, multi-annual cycles to stable dynamics. Theory predicts that this diversity results from combinations of climatic seasonality, weather stochasticity and density-dependent food web interactions. The almost ubiquitous 3-5-yr cycles in boreal and arctic climates may theoretically result from bottom-up (plant-herbivore) and top-down (predator-prey) interactions. Assessing empirically the roles of such interactions, and how they are influenced by environmental stochasticity, has been hampered by food web complexity. Here, we take advantage of a uniquely simple High-Arctic food web, which allowed us to analyze dynamics of a graminivorous vole population not subjected to top-down regulation. This population exhibited high-amplitude, non-cyclic fluctuations - partly driven by weather stochasticity. However, the predominant driver of the dynamics was direct density dependence, which alternated between being weak in summer and strong (overcompensatory) in winter that the population frequently crashed. Model simulations showed that this season-specific density dependence would yield regular 2-year cycles in absence of stochasticity. While such short cycles have not yet been observed in mammals, they are theoretically plausible if graminivorous vole populations are deterministically bottom-up regulated. When incorporating weather stochasticity in the model simulations, cyclicity became disrupted and the amplitude was increased - akin to the observed dynamics. Our findings contrast with the 3-5-yr population cycles involving delayed density dependence that are typical of graminivorous small mammals in more complex food webs, suggesting that top-down regulation is an important component of such dynamics.

Pedro Nicolau

and 2 more

Population dynamics models combine density-dependence and environmental effects. Ignoring sampling uncertainty might lead to biased estimation of the strength of density-dependence. This is typically addressed using state-space model approaches, which integrate sampling error and population process estimates. Such models seldom include an explicit link between the sampling procedures and the true abundance, which is common in capture-recapture settings. However, many of the models proposed to estimate abundance in the presence of heterogeneity lead to incomplete likelihood functions and cannot be straightforwardly included in state-space models. We assessed the importance of estimating sampling error explicitly by taking an intermediate approach between ignoring uncertainty in abundance estimates and fully specified state-space models for density-dependence estimation based on autoregressive processes. First, we estimated individual capture probabilities based on a heterogeneity model, using a conditional multinomial likelihood, followed by a Horvitz-Thompson estimate for abundance. Second, we estimated coefficients of autoregressive models for the log abundance. Inference was performed using the methodology of integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA). We performed an extensive simulation study to compare our approach with estimates disregarding capture history information, and using R-package VGAM, for different parameter specifications. The methods were then applied to a real dataset of gray-sided voles Myodes rufocanus from Northern Norway. We found that density-dependence estimation was improved when explicitly modelling sampling error in scenarios with low innovation variances, in which differences in coverage reached up to 8% in estimating the coefficients of the autoregressive processes. In this case, the bias also increased assuming a Poisson distribution in the observational model. For high innovation variances, the differences between methods were small and it appeared less important to model heterogeneity.