George Crossley

and 8 more

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small diameter, lumenless, catheter delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long term reliability. Methods and Results: The Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi-center, single-arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre-market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre-hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients will participate for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture-free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in-vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow-up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled. Conclusion: The LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short- and long-term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach.

Giovanni Malanchini

and 4 more

Background— According to published evidence, Coronavirus Disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with myocardial injury and could lead to higher risk of arrhythmic complications. However, there is a substantial lack of wide population data on the arrhythmogenic effect of the disease. Objective—to describe the effect of COVID-19 epidemic on arrhythmic burden among high risk patients Methods— This cross-sectional comparative study describes the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) during the epidemic outbreak (study period) and compares it to the same timeframe in 2019 (reference period). Inclusion criteria were age (>18 years) and having an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Results – Among 455 patients (mean age 64.9 ± 15.7 years), 25.1% were females and 39.6% had a CRTD. In the study period, 45 (9.9%) patients experienced a total of 86 VA; 8 patients (1.7%) required anti-tachycardia-pacing (ATP) and 6 (1.3%) at least one shock. In the reference period, a total of 69 events occurred in 36 patients (7.9%). 6 patients (1.3%) required ATP and 3 (0.7%) at least one shock. The number of patients that suffered from any arrhythmic events in the study period (9.9 vs 7.9%) did not significantly differ from the reference period (χ2 = 1.09, p = 0.29). The main predictor of VA during COVID-19 epidemic was previous history of any ICD therapy (OR = 3.84, p < 0.001). Conclusions – No evidence of increase of arrhythmic burden was found during COVID-19 epidemic. The present study contributes to illustrate the impact of the COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system.