Francesca Monari

and 6 more

Objective: To identify pregnancies at risk for adverse outcomes in the late preterm (LP) period, we investigated how gestational age (GA) at delivery, circumstances at parturition, and specific prenatal risk factors may affect neonatal outcomes. Study design: Prospective, area-based cohort study of neonatal morbidity and mortality among singleton infants born between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks, at 21 L&D units in Emilia Romagna county, Italy, during 2013-15. The primary neonatal outcome was a composite of Apgar 5’ ≤ 3, umbilical-cord-blood arterial pH < 7.0, RDS, TTN, hypoglycemia, sepsis, confirmed seizures, stroke, IVH, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, invasive respiratory support and hospitalization ≥ 5 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to respectively investigate the effects on study outcomes of 1) GA at delivery and circumstances at parturition 2) GA at delivery and prenatal risk factors, after controlling for confounding Results: Among 1867 births, 302, 504 and 1061 infants were born at 34, 35 and 36 weeks, respectively. There were no neonatal deaths. When studying circumstances at parturition, an increased risk of composite neonatal outcome was observed among 34 weeks births, 35 weeks deliveries, and indicated deliveries. When studying prenatal risk factors, neonatal morbidity was associated with delivery 34 weeks, birth at 35 weeks, pregestational diabetes, pPROM, maternal BMI, bleeding and polyhidramnios; instead, preeclampsia had a protective effect. Conclusion: LP with indicated deliveries at 34 or 35 weeks, or with specific prenatal risk factors have worse neonatal outcome when compared to 36. Such differences should be considered when counseling patients and planning interventions.

Giovanni Grandi

and 9 more

Objective: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on admissions to gynecological emergency departments (ED). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: 3 different Ob-Gyn EDs of University Hospitals with a similar catchment area: Modena (Emilia-Romagna), Sassari and Cagliari (Sardinia), with different COVID-19 incidence rates. Population: Women who have performed a gynecological ED admission. Methods: Evaluated periods were November 2019 (1st-30th) (N2019) and March-April 2020 (11th March-9th April) (MA2020). Main Outcome Measures: number, indication and management of ED admissions in N2019 and MA 2020. Results: A total of 691 women (mean age: 38.3±14.3 years old) have been included. The relative decrease in the number of women evaluated in MA 2020 in comparison to N2019 was: - 56.6% (95% CI 52.2%-61.1%), similar between Modena [- 62.5% (95% CI 55.4%-79.4%)] and Sassari [- 65.6% (95% CI 57.7-72.9%)] (p=0.68), significantly milder but still present in Cagliari [- 36.2 % (95% 27.9-45.2%)] (p=0.001). Time in ED was also significantly longer in N2019 in comparison to MA2020 (p=0.02). The most evident decrease was observed for pelvic pain indication [-68.9 % (95% CI 60.3-76.7%), - 91 cases], the mildest for problems related to first trimester of pregnancy [-33.6 % (95% CI 25.9-41.9%)]. The management of women suggests a more effective use of ED by patients, with higher rates of hospitalization (p=0.001) and recourse to emergent surgeries (p=0.005), lower rates of discharge at home (p=0.03). Conclusions: COVID-19 lockdown greatly reduced the admission rate to gynecological EDs but the real urgencies were filtered from the more deferrable ones.