Background There is substantial interest in allergen-specific immunotherapy in food allergy. We systematically reviewed its efficacy and safety. Methods We searched six bibliographic databases from 1946 to 30 April 2021 for randomised controlled trials about immunotherapy alone or with biologicals in IgE-mediated food allergy confirmed by oral food challenge. We pooled the data using random-effects meta-analysis. Results We included 36 trials with 2,126 participants, mainly children. Oral immunotherapy increased tolerance whilst on therapy for peanut (RR 9.9, 95% CI 4.5. to 21.4, high certainty); cow’s milk (RR 5.7, 1.9 to 16.7, moderate certainty) and hen’s egg allergy (RR 8.9, 4.4 to 18, moderate certainty). The number needed to treat to increase tolerance to a single dose of 300mg or 1000mg peanut protein was 2. In peanut allergy, oral immunotherapy did not increase adverse reactions (RR 1.1, 1.0 to 1.2, low certainty) or severe reactions (RR 1,6, 0.7 to 3.5, low certainty). It may increase adverse reactions in cow’s milk (RR 3.9, 2.1 to 7.5, low certainty) and hen’s egg allergy (RR 7.0, 2.4 to 19.8, moderate certainty), but reactions tended to be mild and gastrointestinal. Epicutaneous immunotherapy increased tolerance whilst on therapy for peanut (RR 2.6, 1.8 to 3.8, moderate certainty). Results were unclear for other allergies and administration routes. Conclusions Oral immunotherapy improves tolerance whilst on therapy and is probably safe in peanut, cow’s milk and hen’s egg allergy. However, our review found little about whether this improves quality of life, is sustained or cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Characterization of disease endotypes will open a new window for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Herein we provide the first attempt to identify specific AR phenotypes/endotypes and/or any biomarker/predictor for specific treatment response based on local biological parameters. METHODS: This observational study was carried out in 142 patients with seasonal AR and 20 non-allergic controls. Total IgE levels, specific IgE to 112 allergenic molecules and 92 proinflammatory and immunologic proteins were measured in both serum and nasal secretions (NS). RESULTS: We found increased values of MCPs and MMPs in adults both in NS and serum when compared with pediatric patients (p<.05). MCPs and MMPs might represent two effective predictors of chronic inflammation. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, MCPs and MMP1 showed an upward trend both in serum and NS for patients with ≥ 3 comorbidities vs non-allergic controls(p<.05). These data suggest the involvement of these chemokines in the late phase of chronic allergic inflammation in the nose. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 (p<.05) were significantly higher in patients with AR+asthma compared to patients with different comorbidities. Conversely, serum levels of neurotrophin-3 values (p<.05) were significantly higher in those with AR+eczema vs other comorbidities groups. A subgroup of patients with a nasal hypersecretory state,called “hypersecreter endotype” was characterized by paediatric age, male gender, grass pollen sensitization and distributed among persistent, mild or moderate to severe cases of AR. CONCLUSIONS: Our study sets the groundwork for an AR endotypization at molecular level, which is highly desirable to deliver a patient-tailored approach.

Background: Although well described in adults, there are scarce and heterogeneous data on the diagnosis and management of chronic urticaria (CU) in children (0-18 years) throughout Europe. Our aim was to explore country differences and identify the extent to which the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline recommendations for paediatric urticaria are implemented. Methods: The EAACI Taskforce for paediatric CU disseminated an online clinical survey among EAACI paediatric section members. Members were asked to answer 35 multiple choice questions on current practices in their respective centres. Results: The survey was sent to 2,773 physicians of whom 358 (13.8%) responded, mainly paediatric allergists (80%) and paediatricians (49.7%), working in 69 countries. For diagnosis, Southern European countries used significantly more routine tests (e.g., autoimmune testing, allergological tests, and parasitic investigation) than Northern European countries. Most respondents (60.3%) used a 2nd generation antihistamine as first- line treatment of whom 64.8% up dosed as a second- line. Omalizumab, was used as a second line treatment by 1.7% and third-line by 20.7% of respondents. Most clinicians (65%) follow EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines when diagnosing CU, and only 7.3% follow no specific guidelines. Some clinicians prefer to follow national guidelines (18.4%, mainly Northern European) or the AAAAI practice parameter (1.7%). Conclusions: Even though most members of the Paediatric Section of EAACI are familiar with the EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines, a significant number do not follow them. Also, the large variation in diagnosis and treatment strengthens the need to re-evaluate, update and standardize guidelines on the diagnosis and management of CU in children.

ABSTRACT Background During the outbreak of COVID-19 many chilblain-like lesions are being increasingly reported. The aim of the study is to evaluate a possible correlation between pernio like skin lesions and SARS CoV2 infection. Methods All patients underwent not only clinical and laboratory tests to evaluate a possible underlying connective disease, but also specific SARS CoV2 investigations such as oropharyngeal swab and IgG-IgM serology. Results Nine patients, all children, were recruited. 6/9 had respiratory and systemic symptoms that preceded cutaneous findings of approximately 2 weeks. The injuries observed were purplish, erythematous and edematous; four children reported subjective symptoms, painful and pruritus localized to the sole of the feet or to the toes, fingers or heels. Concerning blood exams: 3/9 had D-dimer weakly increased, 4 had ANA positivity: two with a title 1:160, one with 1:320 and one with 1:5120 and a speckled pattern. The latter patient had also ENA SS-A positive and FR positivity, confirmed at a second check, so as to allow us to make a diagnosis of connectivity. 4/9 had aPL positivity (IgM). Reactants acute phase were all negative. Oropharyngeal swabs and serology tests for SARS-CoV2 was negative (borderline in one patient for IgM). Conclusions Even if we do not have enough data to prove it, we hypothesize a correlation between chilblain and SARS-CoV2 infection for an increased number of these lesions described and also because such lesions appeared when temperatures were mild and patients were at home in isolation for the lockdown. Many questions remain open about interaction host-virus.