Climate-driven ecosystem changes are increasingly affecting the world’s ocean ecosystems, necessitating urgent guidance on adaptation strategies to limit or prevent catastrophic impacts. The Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project (FishMIP) is a network and framework that provides standardised ensemble projections of the impacts of climate change and fisheries on ocean life and the benefits that it provides to people through fisheries. Since its official launch in 2013 as a small, self-organised project within the larger Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project, the FishMIP community has grown substantially and contributed to key international policy processes, such as the IPCC AR5 and AR6, and the IPBES Global Biodiversity Assessment. While not without challenges, particularly around comparing heterogeneous ecosystem models, integrating fisheries scenarios, and standardising regional-scale ecosystem models, FishMIP outputs are now being used across a variety of applications (e.g., climate change targets, fisheries management, marine conservation, Sustainable Development Goals). Over the next decade, FishMIP will focus on improving ecosystem model ensembles to provide more robust and policy-relevant projections for different regions of the world under multiple climate and societal change scenarios, and continue to be open to a broad spectrum of marine ecosystem models and modellers. FishMIP also intends to enhance leadership diversity and capacity-building to improve representation of early- and mid-career researchers from under-represented countries and ocean regions. As we look ahead, FishMIP aims to continue enhancing our understanding of how marine life and its contributions to people may change over the coming century at both global and regional scales.

Robust projections of future trends in global fish biomass, production and catches under different fishing scenarios are needed to inform fisheries policy in a changing climate. Trust in future projections, however, relies on establishing that the models used can accurately simulate past relationships between exploitation rates, catches and ecosystem states. Here we use fisheries catch and catch-only assessment models in combination with effort data to estimate regional fishing exploitation levels (defined as the fishing mortality relative to fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, F/FMSY). These estimates are given for large pelagic, forage and demersal fish types across all large marine ecosystems and the high seas between 1961 and 2004; and with a ‘ramp-up’ between 1841-1960. We find that global exploitation rates for both large pelagic and demersal fish are consistently higher than for forage fish and reached their peaks in the late 1980s. We use the exploitation rates to globally simulate historical fishing patterns in a mechanistic fish community model. We find a good match between model and reconstructed fisheries catch, both for total catch as well as catch distribution by functional type. Simulations show a clear deviation from an unfished model state, with a 25% reduction in fish biomass in large pelagic and demersal fish in shelf regions in the most recent years and a 50% increase in forage fish, primarily due to the release of predation pressure. These results can set a baseline from which the effect of climate change relative to fishing could be estimated.

There is an urgent need for models that can robustly detect past and project future ecosystem changes and risks to the services that they provide to people. The Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project (FishMIP) was established to develop model ensembles for projecting long-term impacts of climate change on fisheries and marine ecosystems while informing policy at spatio-temporal scales relevant to the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) framework. While contributing FishMIP models have improved over time, large uncertainties in projections remain, particularly in coastal and shelf seas where most of the world’s fisheries occur. Furthermore, previous FishMIP climate impact projections have mostly ignored fishing activity due to a lack of standardized historical and scenario-based human activity forcing and uneven capabilities to dynamically model fisheries across the FishMIP community. This, in addition to underrepresentation of coastal processes, has limited the ability to evaluate the FishMIP ensemble’s ability to adequately capture past states - a crucial step for building confidence in future projections. To address these issues, we have developed two parallel simulation experiments (FishMIP 2.0) on: 1) model evaluation and detection of past changes and 2) future scenarios and projections. Key advances include historical climate forcing, that captures oceanographic features not previously resolved, and standardized fishing forcing to systematically test fishing effects across models. FishMIP 2.0 is a key step towards a detection and attribution framework for marine ecosystem change at regional and global scales, and towards enhanced policy relevance through increased confidence in future ensemble projections.

This paper is part of the Future Seas project (www.futureseas2030.org), and has been been submitted to the Future. Seas special issue in Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries to be published  in 2021.  Key words equity; Future Seas; industry; interdisciplinary research; ocean; Sustainable Development Goals