Introduction. Few data exist about effectiveness of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) in athletes and feasibility of resuming vigorous exercise afterwards. Aims of our study were to analyze the efficacy and safety of AF CA in athletes, to compare AF CA outcomes in athletes vs Non-Athletes (NA) and to evaluate the feasibility of resuming vigorous exercise. We additionally analyze the outcome of patients that underwent concomitant cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) CA. Methods and results. From January 2015 to October 2019, 38 athletes were retrospectively matched with 38 NA that underwent first time AF CA. After a median follow-up of 787 days, 62.5% of athletes were free from recurrences after one CA procedure and mostly without antiarrhythmic drugs (87%). Seven athletes underwent a redo procedure and all of them were then free of recurrences with an overall freedom from recurrences of 84%. No major complications were observed. After the first year of follow-up, athletes had a 48% reduced risk of recurrences than NA [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) on antiarrhythmic drugs, LA volume and AF subtype, HR 0.52]. Athletes that underwent also CTI ablation showed a positive trend in terms of freedom from recurrences (50% vs 21%). Most (72%) of the athletes resumed vigorous exercise after at least 3 months from the CA. Conclusion. AF CA is a safe and efficient therapeutic option in athletes and it should be considered instead of drugs to early resume competitive sport activity. Concomitant CTI ablation may have a favorable role.

Introduction: Catheter ablation is superior to drugs regarding atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, symptoms improvement, and mortality reduction in heart failure. POLARx™ is a novel cryoballoon, with technical improvements seeking to improve outcomes. So far, its clinical evidence is restricted to a case report. Methods: To compare the POLARx™ cryoballoon procedural safety and efficacy to the already established Arctic Front Advance PRO™ (AFAP) in a single-center cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing AF cryoablation with the POLARx™ were enrolled. Data were prospectively gathered. POLARx™ patients were compared to a historical cohort of patients submitted to AF cryoablation with the AFAP. Results: Seventy patients were analyzed, 20 in POLARx™, and 50 in the AFAP group. They all underwent first-time pulmonary vein isolation, 77% were male, 94% had paroxysmal AF, median age was 62.5 years, median CHA2DS2-VASc 1, left-atrium size 34ml/m², and 65% were receiving anticoagulation. The primary end-point, all pulmonary veins isolation, was 100% in both groups. The complication rate was similar (0% POLARx™ vs. 5.7% AFAP, p=0.39). The median total procedural time was longer in the POLARx™ group (90min vs. 60min, p<0.001), but the overall time-to-isolation (TTI) (44.8sec vs. 39sec, p=0.253) and ablation time (15min vs. 13.7min, p=0.122) was similar between POLARx™ and AFAP groups, respectively. Despite equal TTI, the POLARx™ had a lower minimal temperature reached (-57ºC vs -47ºC, p<0.001). Conclusion: The novel POLARx™ cryoballoon had similar efficacy and safety compared to the AFAP. It was also associated with longer procedural times, similar TTI, and lower minimum temperature reached.