Introduction Patients with food allergies necessite having personalized information on their risk of reaction in “real-life” situations. This multicentric study aimed to investigate the link during accidental reactions between the nature and amount of food allergens consumed in “real life situation” and the severity of the symptoms. Methods Patients were prospectively recruited from the 1 st of December 2020 to the 31 st of December 2021 at the emergency departments in the Geneva University Hospitals and local pediatric urgent care, trough the allergology outpatient consultation, at school and daycare facilities and trough their primary care physicians. Medical history of patients presenting reactions suggestive with immediate food allergy and suspected food samples were collected. Allergy diagnostic tests were retrospectively and prospectively collected. The samples were analyzed for their allergen content. Results We recruited 147 subjects with an accidental immediate-type allergic reaction to a food. We were able to collect 115 reaction-eliciting food samples allowing to quantify the allergen amount occasioning the reaction, as well as correlating this amount to the severity of the reaction. Children represented a large part of the reactors, and most reactions were to common food allergens such as tree nuts, cow’s milk as well as peanuts and hen’s egg. Reactions were mostly to pre-packaged foods and seven were to products with Precautionary allergy labeling, or without labelling to the corresponding allergen. Reactions were of various degrees of severity, and independent to the amount of allergen ingested. Discussion The severity of reactions did not show a direct correlation with allergen quantity, emphasizing individual sensitivity. Some reactions occurred with allergen amounts significantly below the legal limit for mandatory labelling of 1 g/kg in Switzerland. The study also highlighted considerable variability in allergen concentrations in foods labeled with possible “contaminations” or “traces.” These findings raise questions about the accuracy of allergen labeling and regulations.

Prolonged drug provocation with an initial full therapeutic dose to diagnose serum sickness-like reactions (SSLR) to β-lactams in childrenMarcel M Bergmanna,b,c, Eva Gomesd, Natalia Blanca-Lópeze, Jean-Christoph Caubeta, Philippe A Eigenmanna , Giulia Liccioli f, Francesca Morif, Marina Atanaskovic Markovicga Pediatric allergy unit, Department of women, children and adolescents, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerlandb Centro Pediatrico del Mendrisiotto, Mendrisio, Switzerlandc Faculty of Biomedical Science, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerlandd Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugale Servicio de Alergia, Laboratorio de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spainf Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s University Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italyg University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, University Children’s Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia

Immune modulation is a key therapeutic tool for allergic diseases and asthma. It can be achieved in an antigen-specific way via allergen immunotherapy (AIT) or in endotype-driven approach using biologicals that target the major pathways of the type 2 (T2) immune response: IgE, IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13. COVID-19 vaccine provides an excellent opportunity to tackle the global pandemics and is currently being applied in an accelerated rhythm worldwide. It works as well through immune modulation. Thus, as there is an obvious interference between these treatment modalities recommendations on how they should be applied in sequence are expected. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) gathered an outstanding expert panel under its Research and Outreach Committee (ROC). This expert panel was called to evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendation on the administration of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with allergic diseases and asthma receiving AIT or biologicals. The panel also formulated recommendations for COVID-19 vaccine in association with biologicals targeting the type 1 or type 3 immune response. In formulating recommendations, the panel evaluated the mechanisms of COVID-19 infection, of COVID-19 vaccine, of AIT and of biologicals and considered the data published for other anti-infectious vaccines administered concurrently with AIT or biologicals.